Skip to main content

Historical customer story · Plato-connected workflow pilot · April 2026 · Singapore

How DFI Synergy moved its front-desk workflow into Oralstack in three days.

A three-chair, four-provider clinic in Singapore piloted Oralstack's appointment, reception, and reviewed checkout workflows through a Plato-connected deployment.

We used to book on WhatsApp and a paper diary. Now we don't reschedule without it being on the schedule, and the bill is ready before the patient stands up.
Practice manager, DFI Synergy
Schedule · Mon 27 AprLive demoSample Dental Clinic · synthetic data
Chair 1
Chair 2
Chair 3
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
Drag any appointment— confirmation sends instantlyView day →

The situation

DFI Synergy ran a busy general + hygiene practice on a paper diary, supplemented by WhatsApp confirmations and a separate billing spreadsheet. The setup worked when the clinic was smaller — but as appointment volume grew, three problems became routine.

  • Reschedules made on WhatsApp didn't always reach the diary in real time, occasionally producing double bookings.
  • Billing was reconciled at end-of-day. The same-day-bill rate sat at 60%; the rest were follow-ups that cost staff time and aged into receivables.
  • Recall outreach was manual. Patients due for hygiene at six months were tracked in a spreadsheet that nobody updated consistently.

Why Oralstack

DFI Synergy evaluated three options to replace the paper-and-WhatsApp setup: continue with Plato (the dominant Singapore PMS), Open Dental, or Oralstack. The shortlist came down to two requirements neither legacy option met cleanly.

The first was a schedule and reception view the front desk could work from throughout the day. The second was a reviewed checkout flow that kept billable lines, payer estimates, payment recording, and receipts together while preserving the Plato connection boundary.

Oralstack was chosen on a third factor as well: APAC region hosting and a tenant-isolated data model. The clinic agreed to a focused, Plato-connected front-desk pilot. This case study does not claim a standalone deployment or that every legacy record and native PMS workflow moved into Oralstack.

The drag-to-reschedule was the moment it clicked. We could move a patient while keeping the day visible to the rest of the front desk.
Clinical director, DFI Synergy

What ran in the pilot

The initial Plato-connected pilot focused on the staff-facing clinic day and checkout hand-off.

  • Appointments — a shared provider schedule with staff booking and rescheduling.
  • Reception — arrival, queue, chair hand-off, and checkout status in one workboard.
  • Checkout — staff-reviewed line items, payer estimates, payment recording, and receipts.
  • Patient context — directory access and a unified folder for visits, billing, and clinical work.

Illustrations, labelled by scope

  • Reviewed checkout · included in this pilot

    Discharge · Invoice INV-0421Live demoDemo patient 202 · DEMO-1054
    • DCC107Filling, composite (16-O)S$180.00
    • DCC301Polish & scaleS$120.00
    • DCC212Hygiene assessmentS$80.00
    SubtotalS$380.00
    GST (9%)S$34.20
    Total dueS$414.20

    Take payment

    Outstanding S$414.20 · pick a mode · audit-logged on submit

  • Odontogram · product illustration, outside this pilot

    Patient chartLive demoDemo patient 201 · DEMO-1042
    MaxillaryFDI
    18BDOMP
    17BDOMP
    16BDOMP
    15BDOMP
    14BDOMP
    13BDIMP
    12BDIMP
    11BDIMP
    21BMIDP
    22BMIDP
    23BMIDP
    24BMODP
    25BMODP
    26BMODP
    27BMODP
    28BMODP
    R
    L
    LDOMB48
    LDOMB47
    LDOMB46
    LDOMB45
    LDOMB44
    LDIMB43
    LDIMB42
    LDIMB41
    LMIDB31
    LMIDB32
    LMIDB33
    LMODB34
    LMODB35
    LMODB36
    LMODB37
    LMODB38
    MandibularClick to chart

What's next

DICOM/device ingest, automated WhatsApp recall, and other controlled rollouts were not included. This connected workflow pilot is not evidence of a standalone clinic-system cutover.

By the numbers

What changed in the first month.

  • 3 days

    From kickoff to front desk live on Oralstack — schedule and billing.

    Apr 2026

  • 0

    Appointments lost in the transition from the paper diary.

    Apr 2026 transition window

  • 120+

    Drag-to-reschedule operations completed in week three alone.

    Pilot week 3

  • 85%

    Same-day billing rate at week four, up from 60% pre-Oralstack.

    Pre-pilot vs week 4

How the numbers were measured

Same-day billing rate is the share of completed visits where the bill was settled in full before the patient left the chair, measured weekly from Oralstack's discharge-flow billing log against the visit's discharge timestamp. Pre-pilot baseline (60%) was taken from DFI Synergy's prior end-of-day reconciliation reports for Q1 2026, normalised to the same definition. Week-4 measurement (85%) is the trailing 14-day rolling average through the end of the fourth pilot week. Drag-to-reschedule operations are counted from the audit log (entries of type schedule_drag_committed). Cutover days are calendar days from kickoff to the schedule running for live patient traffic without a fallback paper diary running in parallel. Lost-appointment count is reconciled from the patient list at cutover against the first 30 days of bookings.

Buyers reviewing this case study are welcome to ask for the underlying queries — ask about the methodology.

Your next step

See whether this workflow fits your clinic.

DFI Synergy's results reflect one named April 2026 pilot. Share your clinic shape and preferred start mode for a scoped proposal, or request a walkthrough of the Plato-connected run-the-day path used in this evidence.